1 author: Mira Ariel Tel Aviv University 59

Part 3. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Du Bois, J.W. and Englebretson, R. (2005) Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 4. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Ariel: Discourse, grammar, discourse 35
Du Bois, J.W., Chafe, W.L., Meyer, C. and Thompson, S.A. (2000) Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 1. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Du Bois, J.W., Chafe, W.L., Meyer, C., Thompson, S.A. and Martey, N. (2003a) Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 2. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Con- sortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Du Bois, J.W., Kumpf, L.E. and Ashby, W.J. (eds) (2003b) Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Giora, R. (1985) A Text-Based Analysis of Non-Narrative Texts’, Theoretical Linguistics
12: 115–35.
Giora, R. (2003) On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Greenberg, J.H. (1966) Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies.
The Hague: Mouton.
Gregory, M.L., Raymond, W.D., Bell, A., Fosler-Lussier, E. and Jurafsky, D. (1999) ‘The Effects of Collocational Strength and Contextual Predictability in Lexical Production’, paper presented at Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, IL.
Grice, H.P. (1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Haspelmath, M. (1999) ‘Explaining Article-Possessor Complementarity: Economic Motivation in Noun Phrase Syntax’, Language 75: 227–43.
Haspelmath, M. (2006) ‘A Review of John W. Du Bois, Lorraine E. Kumpf, and William
J. Ashby eds. Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function’,
Language 83: 908–12.
Hooper, J.B. (1976) ‘Word Frequency in Lexical Diffusion and the Source of Morpho- phonological Change’, in W. Christie (ed.) Current Progress in Historical Linguistics, pp. 96–105. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Keenan, E.L. and Comrie, B. (1977) ‘Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar’,
Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99.
Kuno, S. (1975) ‘Three Perspectives in the Functional Approach to Syntax’, in R.E. Grossman, L.J. San and T.J. Vance (eds) Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism, 1st edn, pp. 276–336. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Larsen, T.W. (1981) ‘Functional Correlates of Ergativity in Aguacatec’, paper presented at Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA.
Levinson, S.C. (2000) Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mann, W.C. and Thompson, S.A. (1988) ‘Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Func- tional Theory of Text Organization’, Text 8: 243–81.
Newmeyer, F.J. (2008) ‘What Conversational English Tells Us about the Nature of Grammar: A Critique of Thompson’s Analysis of Object Complements’, University of Washington, University of British Columbia, and Simon Fraser University.
Siewierska, A. (2004) Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986/1995) Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Thompson, S.A. (2002) ‘‘‘Object Complements’’ and Conversation towards a Realistic Account’, Studies in Language 26: 125–63.
Thompson, S.A. and Mulac, A. (1991a) ‘A Quantitative Perspective on the Gram- maticization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English’, in Approaches to Grammaticalization, II, pp. 313–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thompson, S.A. and Mulac, A. (1991b) ‘The Discourse Conditions for the Use of the Complementizer That in Conversational English’, Journal of Pragmatics 15: 237–51.
36 Discourse Studies 11(1)
Trueswell, J.C., Tanenhaus, M.K. and Garnsey, S.M. (1994) ‘Semantic Influences on Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Disambiguation’, Journal of Memory and Language 33: 285–318.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1972) Some Aspects of Text Grammars (Janua Linguarum, Series Maior 63). The Hague: Mouton.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1977) Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.
Zipf, G.K. (1929) ‘Relative Frequency as a Determinant of Phonetic Change’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 15: 1–95.



MI R A AR I EL is Professor of Linguistics at Tel Aviv University. Her research focuses on cognitive explanations for language use and grammar (Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents, 1990) and the interface between grammar and pragmatics (Pragmatics and Grammar, 2008; Defining Pragmatics, forthcoming). ADDR ESS : Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel. [email: [e-mail]]

View publication stats
Downloaded from dis.sagepub.com by guest on February 19, 2013