Learning styles theory fails to explain learning and achievement: Recommendations for alternative approaches

Document Outline

• Learning styles theory fails to explain learning and achievement: Recommendations for alternative approaches
  • 1. A brief critique of learning styles
    • 1.1. Lack of clear, explanatory framework
      • 1.1.1. Failure to explain the underlying mechanisms
      • 1.1.2. A blend of borrowed constructs or measures
      • 1.1.3. An ignorance of the research contradicting the theories
    • 1.2. Problems of measurement
      • 1.2.1. Use of less valid measures
      • 1.2.2. Poor reliability and validity
    • 1.3. Failure to link to achievement
  • 2. Multiple alternative approaches
    • 2.1. Individual differences in sensory-based skills better explain verbal-visual styles
    • 2.2. Expert-novice differences better explain concrete-abstract styles
    • 2.3. Individual differences in cognitive processes and personality better explain impulsive-reflective styles
      • 2.3.1. Focus on fluency
      • 2.3.2. Focus on self-regulation, inhibition, and effortful control
      • 2.3.3. Focus on perfectionism
  • 3. Practical implications for classroom teachers
  • 4. Conclusion
  • References