Lesson 3: the comparative method



Download 251,37 Kb.
Pdf ko'rish
bet1/8
Sana13.06.2022
Hajmi251,37 Kb.
#665938
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8
Bog'liq
Lesson 3



Lesson 3: THE COMPARATIVE METHOD 
 
As we have seen, the human mind has been speculating for hundreds of years on 
the origin and relationship of languages. But the solution to all these problems was far 
from being correct because no linguistic material was available. It was not until the
Renaissance that material was gathered for later investigators to work on, and 
they could not help being struck by the amazing similarity between some languages.
Even in the sixteenth century, an Italian missionary called Filippo Sassetti had 
noted the similarity between the Italian numerals from six to nine - 
sei, sette, otto, nove

and their Sanskrit counterparts - 
sas, saptd, astau, nova..
An attempt to classify known 
languages according to the resemblance between them was made by the thinker 
Scaliger in 1599, when he grouped the chief languages after their wont for God, 
calling them respectively the 
deus-theos
(i.e. Latin Greek), 
goit
(Germanic), and 
bog
(Slavonic) languages.
This classification, however intelligent, might have continued blindly along 
these lines for ages, were it not for the discovery of Sanskrit.
In the history of language, the discovery of Sanskrit is often compared to the 
discovery of America in the history of Mankind. It altered at a single stroke the whole 
field of linguistic research.
William Jones, an English lawyer in India, wrote in 1786: "The Sanskrit 
language, whatever be its antiquity, is of a wonderful structure; more perfect than the 
Greek, more copious than the Latin and more acquisitively refined than either; yet 
bearing to both of them a stronger affinity, both in the roots of verbs and in the forms 
of grammar, than could possibly be produced by accident; so strong, indeed, that no 
philologer could examine them all three without believing them to have sprung from 
some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists. There is similar reason, though 
not quite so forcible, for supposing that both the Gothic and the Celtic, though blended 
with a very different idiom, had the same origin with the Sanskrit."
In these often quoted lines, Jones announced clearly and unequivocally the 
relationship between three of the great languages of antiquity-Sanskrit, Greek and 
Latin-and at the same time anticipated the reconstruction of that common source which, 
it seems, no longer exists-the parent Indo-European language itself. 
This climax of language research in the 18th century heralded the full 
blossoming of philology in the 19th century. We have good grounds for saying that 
linguistics as a science was created in the 19th century, especially comparative 
linguistics.
The first of the great pioneers in comparative linguistics of the last century in 
Western Europe was the Danish Rasmus Rask (1787-1832). His major work 
Undersagelse om det gamle Nordiske eller Islandske Sprogs Oprindelse (In-
vestigation on the Origin of Old Norse or Icelandic (1818)
may be called a 
comparative Indo-European Grammar. In this book Rask clearly demonstrated
the significance of laws of sounds as a proof of linguistic kinship, although he added 
that they were especially convincing when supported by grammatical similarities. 
Thus, in Rask we find the whole kernel from which modern linguistic comparative 
methods have been developed.


Rask introduced the idea that the comparison not only of inflectional systems, 
but also of phonetic characteristics, constituted a scientific approach to the examination 
of linguistic relationships; in other words, when properly examined, phonetics could 
provide clues as well as grammar.
Rask examined all the languages bordering geographically on Norse to discover 
whether they were related, and where he found a relationship he followed it up. He was 
the first to recognize the relationship between the languages now called Germanic. The 
scheme of genetic relations between these languages which Rask drew up was quite 
correct.
Rask's great merit was not merely that his scheme of linguistic relationships was 
correct, but that his reasoning in substantiating them was soundly based. He was quite 
right to state in his book that in the comparison of languages the grammatical side 
should never be forgotten, for the coincidence of words was extremely unreliable.
Even without the use of Sanskrit, Rask hit upon the two sound shifts in
the history of the Germanic languages. It should be added that he did not see
the complete regularity of the development of sounds. For example, he did not look for 
the reasons for the exceptions to his main rules. It remained for later generations of 
linguists to make discoveries that introduced a new conception of regularity and 
"law" into the evolution of sounds.
It was spokesmen for the German linguistic tendency called the Young 
Grammarians who insisted in the 1880's on the remarkable regularity of sound-changes 
and proclaimed the principle that phonetic laws admit of no exceptions. If the law did 
not operate in some instances, they said, this was because they had been broken by 
analogy, e.g. by resemblances of sound or meaning which join different words together 
in the speaker's mind. The Young Grammarians believed that these blind fatalistic 
sound laws were purely destructive, breaking the systematic structure of a language 
until the irregularities caused by them had to be remedied by analogous formations. 
The two concepts of sound laws and analogy were considered enough to explain 
practically everything in the development of language.
Some years later objections were raised to inviolable sound laws theory, and 
linguistic facts made students admit the existence of other circumstances which made 
these sound laws more flexible. Exceptions to the rules were explained with reference 
to hitherto unsuspected determining factors. (See Verner's Law below.)
For example, we find in Modern English f as the representative of Middle 
English 
f
in such words as 
fox, foot,
and 
full
. But in the word 
vixen
-"
female
fox"-we 
find 

Download 251,37 Kb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©www.hozir.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling

kiriting | ro'yxatdan o'tish
    Bosh sahifa
юртда тантана
Боғда битган
Бугун юртда
Эшитганлар жилманглар
Эшитмадим деманглар
битган бодомлар
Yangiariq tumani
qitish marakazi
Raqamli texnologiyalar
ilishida muhokamadan
tasdiqqa tavsiya
tavsiya etilgan
iqtisodiyot kafedrasi
steiermarkischen landesregierung
asarlaringizni yuboring
o'zingizning asarlaringizni
Iltimos faqat
faqat o'zingizning
steierm rkischen
landesregierung fachabteilung
rkischen landesregierung
hamshira loyihasi
loyihasi mavsum
faolyatining oqibatlari
asosiy adabiyotlar
fakulteti ahborot
ahborot havfsizligi
havfsizligi kafedrasi
fanidan bo’yicha
fakulteti iqtisodiyot
boshqaruv fakulteti
chiqarishda boshqaruv
ishlab chiqarishda
iqtisodiyot fakultet
multiservis tarmoqlari
fanidan asosiy
Uzbek fanidan
mavzulari potok
asosidagi multiservis
'aliyyil a'ziym
billahil 'aliyyil
illaa billahil
quvvata illaa
falah' deganida
Kompyuter savodxonligi
bo’yicha mustaqil
'alal falah'
Hayya 'alal
'alas soloh
Hayya 'alas
mavsum boyicha


yuklab olish