Health systems in transition
Uzbekistan
19
2.4 Decentralization and centralization
In Uzbekistan, decentralization has been approached gradually. Administrative
functions have been delegated to
viloyat
health authorities, while centralized
decision-making has been retained at the national level.
Devolution in the system is largely reflected in the delegation of budgetary
responsibilities from the national to the
viloyat
level, while keeping a strictly
vertical structure and tight national guidelines and norms, on which decisions
at the
viloyat
level are based. Regional health authorities, although part of
viloyat
governments, are mainly considered to be a quasi-independent branch
of the Ministry of Health. Heads of
viloyat
health authorities are appointed by
the Ministry of Health, upon nomination by the
viloyat
government officials.
Regional health offices are under dual accountability:
to the Ministry of Health
and the local government.
The Ministry of Health has closely controlled the implementation of centrally
developed planning guidelines. Some
viloyats
raise some local income for the
autonomous management of their health services and receive central support
to meet planning guidelines.
The health system has not been exposed to extensive privatization and
continues to be owned in large part by the government, with the exception of
pharmacies and dental care. However, the Uzbek government has encouraged
the setting up of private practices and clinics, in order to mobilize additional
resources and to improve efficiency and quality. There has been a gradual
increase in private health care providers since independence. Private services
are based on private payment arrangements between providers and patients
or third parties (such
as employers, the government, or insurance companies)
on a fee-for-service model. In the past, the private sector had been limited to
single practitioners providing outpatient services. In 2010, new regulations were
introduced that no longer allow single practices in the private sector; however,
single practices in the public sector are still in place. Nowadays, the private
industry has significantly expanded, with many new clinics entering the market
and providing specialized outpatient, inpatient and emergency care services.
2.5 Planning
The Ministry of Health is predominantly involved in planning, managing
and regulating the health services. It issues its own institutional decrees and
protocols to ensure implementation of governmental aims and objectives.
Health systems in transition
Uzbekistan
20
These documents are developed by the relevant departments of the Ministry.
The respective department is also,
in most cases, responsible for monitoring
and evaluation. Within the Ministry of Health, the Main Department for
Organization of Treatment and Prevention is mainly responsible for the overall
management of the health system, supported by the Department of Economy,
Finance and Forecasting with the Department of Management of Human
Resources, and the Main Department of Science and Educational Institutions.
The Ministry of Health issues planning guidelines for the distribution of financial
resources and the management of health care facilities at the
viloyat
level.
Budget setting and the monitoring of budget expenditure for the institutions
at the national level are the responsibility of the Ministry of Health. The
Department of Economy, Finance and Forecasting of the Ministry of Health
works in coordination with the Ministry of Finance to ensure that assignments
from the budget are spent as planned.
A new state treasury framework was set up to improve the control and
monitoring of the use of public funds. The framework
was rolled out nationally
in 2007. In line with this new framework, all expenditures in public health
facilities that are funded through state funds are registered and processed at the
local treasury offices (see Chapter 3) (Republic of Uzbekistan, 2004; President
of Uzbekistan, 2007a).
In the years since independence, national priority areas in health policy have
included the protection of maternal and child health (Cabinet of Ministers, 2001),
the prevention and control of infectious diseases, environmental protection,
the development of primary health care and the strengthening of tertiary care
services (President of Uzbekistan, 1998). The majority of national plans have been
in the domain of health services (particularly related to structure and finance)
with the implicit aim of improving accessibility, equity and quality of care.
The most prominent example of such documents is the
Presidential Decree
of 10 November 1998 on reforming the Uzbek health system (President of
Uzbekistan, 1998). The document identified priority areas in the health system,
including
maternal and child health, the development of the private sector,
quality of care, and a guaranteed package of medical services free at the point
of delivery. In addition to identifying priority areas, the document also sets
some clear targets to be achieved in the form of structural indicators. Examples
of some of the structural indicators and objectives are:
•
transformation of the sanitary-epidemiological sector into a single
organizational structure within the Ministry of Health by 2000;
•
transition to a two-tier primary care system in rural areas by 2005.
Health systems in transition
Uzbekistan
21
The document also defined the role of the Ministry of Health in the health
care sector. According to the
Decree
, primary responsibilities of the Ministry
should be:
•
the development of a regulatory framework with quality standards in the
health care sector, including monitoring of compliance;
•
implementation of governmental health programmes;
•
financing of primary care within a government guaranteed package of
medical services;
•
licensing and accreditation
of health care institutions, pharmacies and
health professionals;
•
regulation of prices for medical services;
•
licensing of pharmaceuticals.
These policies, although they include some elements of the targeted health
plans, mostly emphasize structures and process inputs (such as the number
of primary health care units built or the number of personnel trained). An
emphasis on outcomes is lacking, possibly compromising the achievement of
the ultimate goals set out by these documents: quality, efficiency and access.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: